Dear Parent,
On top of the silly textbook-based education till 10th, got created a scoring system.
On that scoring system of 10th got created a silly tri-partite silly stream-based textbook-based system of higher education.
College, the less said the better. Another set of textbook-based education for 3 or 4 years.
Post-graduate, more textbook-based stuff, barring I guess medical education.
Tell me one thing, in what sort of place would a child tend to learn chemistry better? What should be the combination of textbook and non-textbook education for a child to develop better interest than she already has?
Do you really believe that a youngster studying for at least 21-22 years of life can do only this much by the time she graduates? Is that the only ability and talent that a typical youngster can display to get a job? Really?
What convinces you so much of your beliefs? And why wouldn’t you ask yourself such questions anyway?
Mind you, I haven’t even factored in the textbook-based tuition classes that youngsters are made to sit through and all the textbook-based ed-tech that they’re surrounded with.
No, don’t tell me that youngsters are dancing and becoming popular on social media. It’s some talent I understand; I really am not talking about dancing.
Leave a Reply